PHILOSOPHY - Coloquium - Johanna Thoma, London School of Economics
What’s wrong with pure risk paternalism?
A growing number of decision theorists have, in recent years, defended the view that rationality is permissive in the sense that there is rational leeway in how agents who value outcomes in the same way may choose under risk, allowing for different levels of ‘pure’ risk aversion or risk inclination. One new question that arises once we grant such permissiveness is what attitude to risk we should implement when choosing on behalf of another person. More specifically, my talk is concerned with the question of whether we are pro tanto required to defer to the risk attitudes of the person on whose behalf we are choosing, that is, whether what I call ‘pure risk paternalism’ is problematic. I illustrate the practical and theoretical significance of this question, before arguing that the answer depends less on one’s specific account of when and why paternalism is problematic more generally, and more on what kinds of attitudes we take pure risk attitudes to be.
Dial-In Information
Tuesday, October 19, 2021 at 1:00pm to 2:30pm
Virtual Event- Event Type
- Topic
- Audience
- Department
- Philosophy
- Contact Name
-
Donna Bodenheimer
- Contact Email
- Contact Phone
-
865/974-3255
- Subscribe
- Google Calendar iCal Outlook
Recent Activity
No recent activity