Skip to content

PHILOSOPHY - Coloquium - Johanna Thoma, London School of Economics

What’s wrong with pure risk paternalism?

A growing number of decision theorists have, in recent years, defended the view that rationality is permissive in the sense that there is rational leeway in how agents who value outcomes in the same way may choose under risk, allowing for different levels of ‘pure’ risk aversion or risk inclination. One new question that arises once we grant such permissiveness is what attitude to risk we should implement when choosing on behalf of another person. More specifically, my talk is concerned with the question of whether we are pro tanto required to defer to the risk attitudes of the person on whose behalf we are choosing, that is, whether what I call ‘pure risk paternalism’ is problematic. I illustrate the practical and theoretical significance of this question, before arguing that the answer depends less on one’s specific account of when and why paternalism is problematic more generally, and more on what kinds of attitudes we take pure risk attitudes to be.

Dial-In Information

Zoom link.

Tuesday, October 19, 2021 at 1:00pm to 2:30pm

Virtual Event
Event Type

Lectures & Presentations


Humanities & Social Sciences


Current Students, Faculty & Staff

Contact Name

Donna Bodenheimer

Contact Email

Contact Phone


Google Calendar iCal Outlook

Recent Activity